Fitriani’s work sequentially applies constructivist, realist, and neo-liberal institutional theories to explicate the phenomenon under study. The book provides significant insights into the difference between Asian and European cooperative culture and how it impacts the sustainability of international institutions. Have you read it?
Political
×
Comments
1 thought on “Gaens, Bart, &Khandekar, G. (Eds.). (2018).Inter-regionalrelations andthe Asia- Europe Meeting (ASEM). Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan. ”
Leave a Reply
×
Comments
Leave a Reply
Be the first to share your thoughts. Your voice matters.
×
Comments
1 thought on “Fitriani, E. (2014). Southeast Asians and the Asia-Europe Meeting: State’s interests and institution’s longevity. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.”
Leave a Reply
×
Comments
Leave a Reply
Be the first to share your thoughts. Your voice matters.
×
Comments
Leave a Reply
Be the first to share your thoughts. Your voice matters.
×
Comments
Leave a Reply
Be the first to share your thoughts. Your voice matters.
×
Comments
1 thought on “Bersick, S., & Van der Velde, P. (Eds.). (2011) The Asia-Europe Meeting: Contributing to a new global governance architecture: The eighth ASEM summit in Brussels. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. ”
Leave a Reply
×
Comments
Leave a Reply
Be the first to share your thoughts. Your voice matters.
×
Comments
1 thought on “Robles,A. C. (2012). The Asia-Europe Meeting: The theory and practice of inter-regionalism. London, UK, and New York, NY: Routledge. ”
Leave a Reply
×
to the Editor
Provides an updated overview of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) process. It talks about what’s been accomplished over the past couple of decades, what challenges we’re facing right now, and what new directions ASEM could take as it heads into its third decade as a dialogue forum. Share with us your thoughts on this.